Archive

Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Looking into the Sun

June 13, 2015 Comments off

Electricity non-bill

I shared some info on this on Facebook.  Last year Kim and I decided we wanted to do solar photovoltaic on our home.  We knew we had a nice, south-facing open roof, it seemed big enough, and we all see fairly frequently articles on how cost of solar is dropping, so we took the plunge and started looking at options.

In our town there are many people with solar; I can see 1 such home from my back porch, and SF writer acquaintance of mine Jeff Carver also has a solar system.  Asking about online I saw that there were two active solar installers used by people in Arlington, one of which is Sunbug Solar.  Anyway I contacted Sunbug, the other outfit, and yet a 3rd, state-wide installer I found online.  The other outfit never got back to me, and bachelor #3 seemed technically not very savvy, so I went with Sunbug.

What do I mean by “technically not very savvy”?  I’m no expert in solar systems, but I can use Google, and I know that there are different grades of panel with different efficiencies, and that there are different ways of  gathering the DC output of the panels and turning it into AC, which is what your house needs.  The non-savvy solar people could not answer a single question, they had a set system they were pitching me, take it or leave it.  Meanwhile the folks at Sunbug seemed to like talking about this stuff – were excited, even – and that made the decision to go with them very easy.

The system I arrived at with Sunbug has 24 SunPower 327W panels. This means that under ideal conditions the system can deliver 7.85 kW of power.  Of course conditions are never perfect, and the sun don’t shine 24 x 7.  Here’s what production looks like on a day of typical sun:

solar-output

Power generation reaches close to peak at about 10 am and stays there 3:30 pm or so, then drops.  The highest output I yet have achieved is 7 kW.

Anyway the system makes more electricity than I use – thus my negative electric bill for last 3 months.  I may not stay negative all through the summer – in the hot months I run dehumidifiers in my basement and they draw considerable power.

Of course all this is not free.  The system, fully installed, cost just under $39,000.  But right off the bat you get a Massachusetts rebate of $1,250, and a federal tax credit (not deduction) of 30% of your costs, plus a $1,000 Mass State tax credit.  All this put the upfront cost at about $25k.  But there’s more!  Massachusetts supports SRECs or Solar Renewable Energy Credits.  In brief outline, SRECs work this way: Different states want to encourage use of solar.  They therefore require utilities to show a proportion of their output comes from solar.  Utilities can do the generation on their own and meet the regulatory requirement that way, or they can buy from me the right to put forth my solar generation as credit towards their obligations.  SRECs are traded in a market like commodities and their prices will fluctuate based on plain ‘ol supply and demand.  Essentially utilities pay me to generate my own electricity by solar.

Bottom-line: Even with the minimum forecast prices for SRECs, my capital costs for the solar system will be recouped in 6 years.  For the 24 forecast years of system life after that, it is free electricity, no electric bills, and maybe even a small surplus.

Certainly this won’t be for everyone.  6 years seems like a short time to me but it may be an eternity to you.  And as fun as is is to gloat over a $0 electricity bill, you may have other more pressing needs for your money.  Finally be aware there’s other ways to get into solar than owning the whole show, like leasing the system.

In the end, panels or no, we all need sunshine, sometime.  I’ll leave you with The Soggy Bottom Boys, till next time …

Categories: Technology Tags: ,

You keep using that word …

April 4, 2015 1 comment

Master swordsman (not strategist) Inigo Montoya

And, what is the word?  No, not inconceivable – the word I have in mind is strategy.

Working in software products of course I have heard “strategy” in one context or another on a daily basis 20 years of more, and now as a product manager I hear it even more, if such a thing is possible.  However what the vast majority of self-styled strategists are really talking about is just features, like “Our strategy is to have web-based something-or-other”, or “Our strategy is to use middleware to achieve this-or-that”.  These kinds of statements are not strategy, they are just features or architectures.

What is strategy?  Among the things that stuck with me from my time in B-school at Babson was a statement from a professor (a former partner at Bain & Co.) answering that very question.  He said:

Strategy is: Where do you play? and How do you win?

 

“Where you play” is your target segment.  If you are not targeting some specific thing, you already don’t have a strategy.  Certainly the very biggest players in some industries can address really big and wide markets, but even the obvious examples – like Apple – use some targeting.  If asked about the target market for Apple I bet a lot of people would answer, “Everybody”.  Not true.  Apple targets higher-income consumers, and adapts for sub-markets in that group, like convenience-oriented multi-tasking men age 25-55, or family-oriented women age 20-40 who use technology to stay connected with friends and family.  I think segmenting is in fact even more important in the business software world.  I often hear vendors – my own employer included – saying things like “We sell to the biggest enterprises” or “We aim at the mid-market”.  These are probably true statements but they’re not helpful.  All business have specific problems inherent to their place in their market – they need to sell faster, or need to communicate with more customers, or need higher manufacturing efficiency, things of that nature.  If the benefit you provide is too generic and doesn’t address a clear problem and pressing problem, then you are a nice-to-have, not a must-have … and, nice-to-haves finish last.

“How do you win?” is a bigger question than most people think.  Many people believe winning is solely about better features: my light bulb lasts longer than the competition, my body-spray smells better, my car goes faster, my collaboration is more collaborative, stuff like that.  But think – Why are there so many examples of outwardly inferior products dominating their markets?  In my own industry I think the most telling example is Microsoft Sharepoint.  Now I can’t say Sharepoint is especially inferior; the product has a 12 year history after all and has seen a lot of improvement in its time.  But when Sharepoint came out it was not especially innovative and even today is criticized for having lousy administration, being slow and unwieldy, and for promoting “document graveyard” styles of collaboration.  For all that, Sharepoint apparently drives $2B of revenue a year for Microsoft.  How can something so bad be so successful?

Lots of reasons, actually.  A big one is network effects. Lots of people have Windows, lots of people use Windows Server, lots of people develop for Microsoft systems … all of this creates an ecosystem where technology buyers are likely to know about Sharepoint or know someone who knows.  From this they get confidence that the Sharepoint bet is a good one.

Next is ease of acquisition.  Sharepoint is easy to buy – just an option in your per-user Windows licensing – and easy to deploy – it’s a standard Windows server like all Windows services.  This short time to value goes a long way towards easing concerns the customer might have about not getting the ideal solution, from a features perspective.

Finally think about Sharepoint’s feature-gaps – real or imagined – as opportunities and not liabilities.  Enabled by the network-effect and Sharepoint’s  ease of acquisition/deployment, there is a large after-market of ISVs who offer products and services to augment Sharepoint or address its shortcomings.  Microsoft claims over 700,00 developers write for Sharepoint.  That number is probably too high, but there’s no question there are 1000s of Sharepoint partner vendors and 100s of solutions for the platform.

Network effects; Ease of acquisition; Developer ecosystem .. almost like they planned this, right?

Anyway my point is not that Sharepoint is some great thing.  In fact I see it as just sitting there waiting to get bumped off, the way Wordstar was bumped off by WordPerfect, and WordPerfect was bumped off by Word.  The point is, Sharepoint actually has a strategy and features are only one part of it.

Anyway, happy to talk to you about strategy.  Just be aware before you come by there’s a 2-question quiz: Where do you play? and How do you win?  If you don’t pass the quiz I may send you to this master for remedial training:

Bugs studies "stragety"

Another Opening, Another Show

March 22, 2015 Comments off

Enterprise Connect 2015

In my job as a Product Manager I find myself doing a lot more travel than when I was in engineering.  Been to three trade shows already this year, IBM’s ConnectED in January, Team Polycom in February, and just this past week, Enterprise Connect.  All three were in Orlando, FL.  If you don’t know it, in addition to being the promised land for lovers of all-things Disney, Orlando hosts 100s of conferences and trade-shows each year, ranging from the tech-oriented shows that I attend, to shows like Snaxpo, “The world’s largest, most comprehensive trade show devoted exclusively to the international snack food industry”, where you can attends sessions like : The State of Snacking: Finding an Identity in a Rapidly-Changing World; and shows like the International Fly Tackle Dealer Show, “the largest international gathering of fly fishing manufacturers, retailers, sales reps, media and fly fishing organizations in the world”.  I’ll leave it to the reader to imagine the result if only these two shows could join forces.

Back to Enterprise Connect.  This show is about unified communications in all its forms.  In the past the main topics at EC Shows have been the core technology – how do things work – and to some extent, interoperability – for example, how does video from company A talk to video from company B?  This year’s show had a distinct collaboration focus, however, with a strong emphasis on solutions that are easy to use, highly mobile, and lead to fast, straight-forward benefits.  Taking their cue from “over the top” applications like WhatsApp and #Slack, UC leaders Cisco and Unify introduced their Spark and Circuit offerings respectively – both being team-oriented chat, meeting and content-sharing apps, all with a social flavor.  So one of the big takeaways was, it’s not about ‘speeds and feeds” anymore, it’s about putting tools in the hands of users that they control and can use to get work done quickly and easily.  For my own product, IBM Sametime, this is a pretty timely message – hopefully we can bring together some of the concepts we’ve been brewing to not only equal these first-movers but to surpass them.

Of course one of the charms – such as they are – of trade shows is swag.  Tramping the exhibitor hall you will see stalwarts carrying show-bags loaded down with everything from pens to stress-balls to lightsabers.  But the best time to go swag hunting is  when the exhibitors’ hall closes down, because everyone want to pack up and ship back as little as possible.  Using this strategy my friend and colleague Karl scored some cool loot from Logitech, including a BCC950 Conference Cam:Karl and his swag

Tradeshow season is winding down, till things start up again in early Fall.  Hopefully by then I’ll have some product news of my own to pitch – assuming of course I can pass up that innovative snack foods-fly fishing tie in …

Winter Streaming

February 1, 2015 Comments off

Windows Media CenterWay back in ‘06 I setup a home DVR based on BeyondTV, a pretty nicely done Windows DVR app.  That was long, long ago, but frankly we had no reason to change, so we just kept on time-shifting by doing recordings through a tuner card and our ancient Comcast cable box.

But for all things there is a time and for the old DVR, that time has come.  I wanted to do streaming, and  I wanted to cut my costs with Comcast, so I set out to build a new rig to replace the old.  A few hours on trusty newegg.com  and I had the right list of components:

  • MSI A78M-E35 Motherboard
  • AMD A8-5500 Trinity Quad-Core 3.2GHz FM2 65W Desktop APU with DirectX 11 Graphics
  • SILVERSTONE Black Aluminum / Steel ML04B Micro ATX Media Center / HTPC Case
  • SILVERSTONE Strider Plus ST50F-P 500W ATX PS
  • Scythe SCSK-1100 100mm Shuriken Rev. B 3 Heat Pipes CPU Cooler
  • Rosewill RHRC-11002 Windows 7 Certified MCE IR Remote Controller
  • Seagate Hybrid Drive ST1000DX001 1TB MLC/8GB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s
  • ASUS Black Blu-ray Drive SATA Model BC-12B1ST
  • SiliconDust HDHR3-CC HDHomeRun PRIME digital tuner

Neat things … first of all these AMD combined CPU/GPU chips seem cool to me, literally and figuratively.  No graphics card needed, the CPU has one built in.  With 65W power, the whole thing draws little power.  The Scythe Shuriken cooler is a low-profile unit, fits just right in the case and is extremely quiet.  The Seagate drive … 1 TB and close to SSD speeds, for $80; what’s not to like?

Case and power supply are from Silverstone.  I wanted to get a fairly small case to fit in my TV stand and the Silverstone fits that bill.  The inside setup is tight, though, so make sure you get a PS as small as the Strider.

The thing that makes it all work is the HDHomeRun PRIME from SiliconDust.  It was with some trepidation I took my 2 old Comcast cable boxes and headed for their service center.  Expecting an interrogation, instead in 5 mins and with no hassle I had traded in the boxes for a cable card, a way to get authenticated content from your cable provider.  Back at home, plugged the HDHomeRun onto my home network, plugged the cable card into the HDHomeRun and, after a few short calls to Comcast activation, voila!  I now have 3 – count ‘em, 3! – digital TV tuners on my network.

The DVR app is Windows Media Center, which is a “free” part of Win 7 Ultimate.  This of course is what put BeyondTV out of the personal DVR business.  Still doing the setup to WMC, like making our recording rules.  And while I can watch all our old shows in WMC, the UI for searching through them frankly sucks.  One thing that was built in to BeyondTV was compression and commercial-skips.  Now with WMC I need an add on like DVRMSToolbox.

Lastly, with this new box I finally have a Blu-ray player.  First disk to get: Blade Runner 30th Anniversary Collectors Edition.  DVRs: Like any other machine, either a benefit, or a hazard …

Categories: Technology

2014 in Technology

December 31, 2014 Comments off

tech-new-year

2014 is nearly gone and while the champagne is chilling (Champagne Aubry this year) I thought I’d look back on the year-that-was, tech-wise …

Edward Snowden

This story broke in 2013, but has only deepened in 2014 as new documents have been released.  We found that the NSA has active efforts in place to hack cell networks worldwide, can read a lot of SSL/TLS traffic, and most recently is able to listen in on any Skype call. President Obama proposed reforms for the NSA, that Snowden assessed as “incomplete”.

The discussion on amnesty for Snowden has already begun.  For my part I hope that happens in 2015.

Privacy & Security

One unsettling thing about the Snowden revelations is that we always knew, at some level, that the NSA was doing lots of stuff, but we chose to ignore it.  Movies like Enemy of the State and The Simpsons Movie showed NSA capabilities in futuristic and/or tongue in cheek ways, so the actual (and mostly unintended) warnings in these films were easy to dismiss.

In the private sphere we had no such excuses.  In August, nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence were published online, together with photos of 24 other celebrities.  Apparently this was accomplished with a simple brute force password attack, combined with an Apple “find my phone” bug.  Of course we faceless masses have some safety, in that the return – in money or in prestige – in attacking a single one of us is much less than the return in attacking a public figure.  But it is only a matter of time before peoples’ online bank accounts and other financial resources get targeted in a systematic way.

If you don’t know by now, your password is not secure.  It hardly matters how clever you are in devising multi-word mnemonics, tools like WordHound will crack it.  The main method I use for passwords I care about is the Schneier Scheme, by worldwide security alpha-dog Bruce Schneier.  Better still are 2-factor authentication systems, like RSA SecurID – if your online financial institution supports them, get it fast as you can.

Gamergate

While it may be that, on the internet no one knows you’re a dog, Gamergate showed us how many of these dog-indeterminate creatures are totally determinant jerks.  It all started with some painfully obvious observations about sexism in gaming – I mean we have sexism in politics, in entertainment, and in business, why not in gaming?  But, it turns out these sexist gamers have Reddit accounts and they’re not afraid to use them.  The backlash against women game developers and culture critics went beyond typical trollish/crude commentary to include threats of violence.  Amazingly there are those who contend this was a real debate about ethics in the gaming industry.

I feel this sad episode achieved resonance because it is the application of attack politics to an everyday thing.  Even if the US Supreme Court rules that violent threats on Facebook are are criminal offenses, I’m afraid that is just the start of the civility journey for 2015.

Satya Nadella & Microsoft Reborn

In February Microsoft got a new CEO when Satya Nadella replaced monkey-boy Steve Ballmer.  Since then Microsoft stock, long a moribund performer, has gone up about 26%, compared to increases of 15% and 9% for NASDAQ and the Dow, respectively.  How did this happen?

One factor is that Microsoft’s cloud business, started under Ballmer, is growing extremely fast, doubling in the past year to a total of $4.4B.  Next, despite rumors of selling the XBox business, that segment also did very well, selling double the number of units in fiscal 2014.  Finally the company made shrewd moves that unite the consumer and enterprise spaces, like offering a free version of Office for tablets, and announcing Skype for Business which unites the enterprise Lync business with the consumer-oriented Skype business.

Unifying all this is a vision Nadella articulated in a memo to employees:

At our core, Microsoft is the productivity and platform company for the mobile-first and cloud-first world. We will reinvent productivity to empower every person and every organization on the planet to do more and achieve more.

Nadella talks a lot about the “dual user”, someone who uses technology for work but also for their personal life.  A simple observation, but a powerful one.  There is probably no company better positioned than Microsoft to surf this wave.

Apple & iPhone 6

Apple’s market-cap hit $700B in November, making it far and away the most valuable company in the world.  Despite the doom and gloom of Tim Cook’s early days as CEO, today there is little doubt CEO Cook is a worthy and effective successor to Steve Jobs.  The iPhone 6 launch in September was a huge success, with Apple selling over 10 million units of the new models in the first 3 days of availability.  Cook has also diversified the product line with items like the iPad Mini and iPhone 5c, cheaper ways for customers to get into the Apple fold.

On the strategy front, Cook has spent some long-hoarded cash on acquisitions, like Beats Music & Electronics, and mobile podcast streaming app Swell.  In fact since acquiring the Cue personal productivity app in Oct. 2013, Apple has acquired 13 companies, all over the tech and consumer space.  In a ground breaking move, Cook closed a deal with China Mobile to sell the iPhone in the biggest market in the world.  Finally on the enterprise front, Apple created a partnership with IBM to bring a full spectrum of “made for business” apps to the #1 consumer platform in the world.

All is not perfect in the Apple universe.  Reports persist of supply-chain partners exploiting workers.  The long-anticipated Apple Watch is not a runaway hitApple Pay is a solution in search of a problem.  And, the company does not have the advantages of a content-based part of its business like a Facebook or a Microsoft; Apple is a platform where you access non-Apple content.

Lots of people have bet against Apple and lost.  I expect those people will still be losing in 2015.

Energy

Energy prices dropped like crazy in 2014.  Oil is $59 a barrel, down from the $100 price that persisted since around 2010, and well down from the $140 peak price in 2008.  The cost of solar is plummeting even faster, with the cost of panels now less than the average cost of retail electricity.  Here at the Salazar household we are in the midst of putting in a 7.85 kW system that on many days, I expect, will completely cover our power needs.

This energy glut is certainly an old-fashioned economic shot in the arm, but more importantly I think it will catalyze massive innovation in storage, monitoring and optimization.  Bill Gates is investing in liquid metal battery technology, that enables storage of power close to the consumers, new SaaS solutions are emerging that allow building operators to optimize energy use, while the internet of things – broadly-realized telemetry of any device – will enable energy management of just about anything.

This is economically counter-intuitive – usually when the price of something drops the incentive to manage and conserve that thing also drops.  I think everyone is acting on future expectations that energy prices, and the costs of “externalities” like pollution and global warming, will all go up.

Uber, the “sharing economy” & Big Data

Transportation-booking app Uber seemed to live by the rule that any publicity is good publicity.   Some of the items in the Uber-feed: An Uber exec threatened to “dox” a journalist who wrote a negative article; Uber drivers across the globe have been implicated in rapes; taxi drivers worldwide have protested against it; and, the company is reputed to have booked thousands of fake rides on rival service Lyft.  Yet, the valuation of the company is an astonishing $40B – for a company with assets that are almost entirely intangible, that is extra-amazing.  I guess that is good publicity, people figure this app must be worth using, since they company does at least $10M per week revenue in just its top 5 USA cities.

Uber, like room-renting service AirBNB, came up on the notion of the “sharing economy” – a business model where through coordination services that enable anyone to be a service provider, we all benefit.  I have an extra room, why shouldn’t I rent it?  I have time (goodness knows how) to give people rides, why shouldn’t I get paid for it?  What makes this possible is born on the web big-data technologies like MongoDB, Python, Node.js and others – with these, any team of 5-6 reasonably talented developers can build a perfectly good Uber.  Now, Uber has 550 employees.  My guess is the vast majority are customer service or other logistics roles.  There are probably no more than 50 people in all engineering and technical operations for the company – 50 engineers for a $40B company.

I believe (and hope) that these disproportionate valuations and expectations will level out in 2015.  Uber is a good idea.  However this year I used similar services in Singapore, Kuala Lumpur and Beijing that were every bit as nice, and got me rides in accredited taxis, not with a “sharer” of unknown skills and motivations.

 

Silicon Valley – Let’s Not Go There, It Is A Silly Place

Uber is an example of 21st century Silicon Valley, where there’s an app for everything and business models rule. “Disruption” is the must-have word in every pitch – if you are not disrupting something, why bother? I think it is hard to see something like Uber as anything but exploitative – the “disruption” doesn’t create anything new, it just shifts it from the current owners to the disrupters.  But isn’t this innovation the engine that drives our economy and makes our lives better?

No, it makes the VC’s lives better, as Andrew Leonard writing in Salon points out.  A key paragraph:

The reality of our current situation is that the rich are getting richer while the rest of us flounder. Some of the “sharing” economy companies that Andreessen invests in offer a perfect demonstration of this thesis. The founders and investors in Airbnb and Lyft stand to become millionaires while the consumers of these services stretch their dollars by giving each other rides or renting out their spare rooms. That’s a business mode that not only perpetuates growing inequality but actually profits from the desperation of people having a harder and harder time making ends meet.

Ok, they are in business and the need/urge to make a buck is understandable.  But some of these guys are just plain wacky.  Look at Bitcoin.  Tons of Silicon Valley insiders are buying in to the “cryptocurrency”, apparently unaware that logically speaking Bitcoin as a currency is worse even than gold.

The real thing about Bitcoin and why the Valley-types love it is the Libertarian connection.  As a synthetic currency Bitcoin is not tied to any government or physical place.  This is exactly what you need if you plan to move yourself to a government-less Libertarian artificial island.

Finally, I came across a great article in the latest issue of Harpers: Come With Us If You Want To Live (Among the apocalyptic libertarians of Silicon Valley), by Sam Frank. (paywall link).  I can’t give you the whole thing, suffice to say if you read it you will come across vegans and Crossfit-ers arguing about hedons vs. utilons, debating the pros & cons of DAOs (distributed autonomous organizations) and still others doing Bayesian optimizations of their personal thought processes.  One such visionary informs us about the imminent cataclysms faced by our society:

“There are all of these different countdowns going on … There’s the countdown to the broad postmodern memeplex undermining our civilization and causing everything to break down, there’s the countdown to the broad modernist memeplex destroying our environment or killing everyone in a nuclear war, and there’s the countdown to the modernist civilization learning to critique itself fully and creating an artificial intelligence it can’t control.  There are so many different … ways in which the self-modifying intelligent processes that we are embedded in undermine themselves.”

Note to self: Great idea for an app, “MemeplexID”, a single photo taken by cell-phone identifies for you which destructive memeplex you are confronted with.

And that’s it.

All I can think of right now about 2014.  Soon will be moot anyway, as 2015 will soon be here with its own new memes, streams and themes.  Here’s hoping they all play nice, in the real world as well as in the memeplex.  Peace.

Categories: Technology

The Long Tail of the Personal Brand

June 28, 2014 2 comments

Fernando's logoLately it seems we are surrounded – sometimes aggressively so – by advice that we must build our “personal brand”.  Like pretty much anyone in my business I have accounts (mostly unpaid) on sites like The Ladders and of course LinkedIn.  The regular emails I get from these sites constantly exhort me to promote the new-and-improved Salazar through my own brand.  The Ladders tells me:

 

Besides a marriage proposal, your value in the job market is probably the most important product you’ll ever sell.  … Your brand is what you’re known for and what you’re known for knowing. Use that to your advantage in making a career transition.

Great work-life-balance point they make there about marriage, which apparently in the eyes of The Ladders is also about selling.  Meanwhile the folks at LinkedIn offer this #1 tip on building a personal brand:

#1: Be authentic. The best personal brands are genuine and honest both in person and online. It can be tricky to showcase your personality on the web (you might love puns, but those don’t go over well on a professional profile), but it’s possible with a bit of effort.

Or, as Oliver Stone wrote in Nixon, “Nothing sells like sincerity.”

What occasions these observations is an article in the Times, The Self-Promotion Backlash.  The article is itself an observation on a new book, “Invisibles: The Power of Anonymous Work in an Age of Relentless Self-Promotion,” by David Zweig.  Just got this for my Kindle, and after only a few pages of the intro its thesis is crystal clear: Vastly more economic output is generated by “invisible” non-self-promoters than by all the glad-handing, like-me-on-Facebooking, personal-branding addicts that seem to be surging ahead everywhere we look.  One of the first examples Zweig talks about are fact-checkers, in his case at the CIA: pretty obviously essential, and pretty obviously invisible.

In the high-tech industry, because we make the tools that allow all this personal branding in the first place, we’re expected to use them and to do so loudly and often.  How bizarre that software engineers, one of the most introverted, invisible occupations you’re likely to find, get marked down because they are insufficiently “visible”.  This is sales culture run amuck.  Look, sales and sales-people – love ‘em, need ‘em, all that – but the cultural needs of engineering are vastly different from sales.  Back in the day, the men and women I most respected hardly ever spoke.  They were valued for their knowledge and their ability to show and tell novices, as I was, what to do to turn out good code.

I’m afraid nostalgia is an inevitable product of age, and for that I apologize.  But, if we did a 1 week ban on self-promotion, what would happen?  Quality go up? Output go up?  An impractical experiment of course … still, can’t help but wonder.

I’ll leave you all with this, the most influential drum-line is all the history of rock and roll, Led Zeppelin’s When the Levee Breaks.  It wasn’t created by drummer John Bonham, or Zeppelin lead guitarist and producer Jimmy Page, but by a recording engineer – and an invisible – named Andy Johns.  Enjoy.

And the winner is …

January 24, 2014 Comments off

The Rosetta Stone

Afraid further pic-posts from our London trip will have to wait, as I am later today off to the US for our yearly Collaboration-Services Conference, IBM Connect 2014.  There among the things I will do is present an hour-long session in video-panel format, with 10 developers from my worldwide team answering questions and sharing insights about IBM Sametime.  Though I have no fears about the software holding up, networking at these events is always tricky, so wish me luck.

But before I go I wanted to award a Mighty Marvel No-Prize to my good friend Tom, who correctly identified the location of the crowd-shot in my last post as The Rosetta Stone.  The shot above is closest I could get and was taken 1-handed with camera aloft.  I guess seeing as this is an artifact at the British Museum that virtually everyone has heard of, it’s not surprising people would cluster round.  But for those of us who read neither hieroglyphics, nor demotic, nor ancient Greek (the three languages used on the stone) I can only say it is a nice stone indeed, of impressive heft and neatly done carving, and one that would be a great conversation starter if displayed in the family den.

Now, back to a few hours of work, including some rehearsal for my talk, and then at 6:30 pm my time I embark to Mumbai to begin the journey towards Orlando and all things Collaborative and Mousey.  I should land in Florida around 6 pm Saturday local time, for an elapsed travel time of about 35 hours.  Such are the joys of international business life.

Categories: Sundries, Technology, Travel